RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02501
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His service time in the Navy be added to his DD Form 214, Report
of Separation from Active Duty.
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He spent 4 years, 3 months and 8 days in the Navy; however, this
time was excluded from his DD Form 214.
In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his
DD Form 214 issued in conjunction with his 1 March
1978 retirement from the Air Force.
The applicants complete submission, with attachment, is at
Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant retired from the Regular Air Force on 28 February
1978 after serving 20 years, 8 months and 2 days of total active
service. His DD Form 214 for this period reflects 4 years,
3 months and 8 days of Foreign and/or Sea Service.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIPV recommends denial. The applicants DD Form
214 issued in conjunction with his retirement includes his total
active service. Item 12a, Net Active Service this Period, item
12b, Prior Active Service, and item 12c, Total Prior Active
Service, includes the periods of service included in the five DD
Forms 214 the applicant was issued during his service and totals
20 years, 8 months, and 2 days total active service. The
4 years, 3 months, and 8 days the applicant asserts he spent in
the Navy actually denotes his overseas service, which is
included in his total active service.
?
The complete DPSIPV evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit
B.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 26 January 2015, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was
forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within
30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this
office (Exhibit C).
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the
rationale expressed as the basis for our conclusion the
applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find
no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2014-02501 in Executive Session on 9 April 2015, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2014-02501 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 16 June 2014, w/atch.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIPV, dated 28 October
2014,w/atchs.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 26 January 2015.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00774
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which is at Exhibit C and D. ________________________________________________________________ _ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPV recommends denial. The complete DPSIPV evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. APFC/DPSOR recommends the applicants DD Form 214 be corrected to read, Attended Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00388
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00388 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to reflect his Total Prior Active Service as 1 month and 22 days, instead of 10 months and 15 days. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00376
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00376 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His two years of service at the United States Coast Guard Academy (USCGA) be included in the calculation of his retirement pay. Retired pay is calculated based on creditable service outlined in Title 10, USC, §1405, Years of Service. Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 Jul 14.
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC 2010 02795
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02795 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect his time as a student at the Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences (USUHS). At the time of the applicants service and per the statement of service...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01698
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01698 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, reflect time served in items 12c - Net Active Service This Period; 12d - Total Prior Active Service; 12e – Total Prior Inactive Service; and 12f – Foreign Service. The DPSIPV...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00773
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00773 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect credit for four six-week periods of required active duty service performed as a participant in the Air Force Health Professions Scholarship Program...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01576
His records corrected to reflect his pay date adjusted by one day, if it is not changed from 25 September 2001 to 29 September 2001. The applicants pay date and total active federal military service date (TAFMSD) were adjusted to reflect the four days he was charged for lost time. Furthermore, after a thorough review of the applicants record, it was determined his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty, Block 29, Dates of Time Lost During This Period, should...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01390
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01390 XXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. (Administratively Corrected) APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His time at the USAFA from 1966 to 1970 is not reflected on his DD Form 214. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01425
DPSIPV states that according to 10 USC, section 2126 the applicant will not be given active duty credit on his DD Form 214 because time spent in USUHS is not counted in determining eligibility towards retirement. In addition, Air Force Instruction 36-2604, Service Dates and Dates of Rank, defines EAD for the purpose of determining service dates as duty on the ADL of an armed service for 90 days or more. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-03035
The applicant should have received a DD Form 214 for his prior active duty service. However, his military personnel record was not available from the National Personnel Record Center; therefore, DPSIPV was unable to verify whether the applicants service was continuous active duty from May 70. The complete DPSIPV evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANTS REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He feels a typing error was made...